Critique this article:
|Word Length Focus Skills Minimum Value References |
|1,000 words|| |
|15 Peer Reviewed Journal Articles|| |
Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P.E. (2001). A study of women who stalk. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 2056-2060.
You need to write a short (1,000 word) critique of the above article. Remember, critique is about what is bad AND good. You must highlight good or bad aspects of the article USING OTHER ARTICLES. For example, was there a sampling issue? Did they define stalking in an appropriate way?
Here are some references to get you started. You do not have to use these references if you don’t wish to.
Kamphuis, J.H. & Emmelk, P.M.G. (2000). Stalking – A contemporary challenge for forensic and clinical psychiatry, British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 206-209.
Peytchev, A., Baxter, R.K., & Carley-Baxter, L.R. (2009). Not all survey effort is equal: Reduction of nonresponse bias and nonresponse error, Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 785-806.
Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P.E. (2005). Association between stalking victimisation and psychiatric morbidity in a random community sample, British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 416-420.
Spitzberg, B.H., Cupach, W.R., & Ciceraro, L.D.L. (2010). Sex differences in stalking and obsessive relational intrusion: Two meta-analyses, Partner Abuse, 1(3), 259-285.
Article Review: Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P.E. (2001). A study of women who stalk. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 2056-2060
Reference Style: APA
In the article, “A study of women who stalk”, the authors Purcell, Pathé & Mullen (2001) described the relationship variation between the stalking patterns between the males and females. The author has observed the critical factors for obtaining a data-backed conclusion. There are several data and statistics included in the research paper to support the claims of the author. Thus, the research has been completely argumentative were the conclusions provided by the author has not been just mere claims but analysed derivations. The author has collected these data to present a new idea which proves the point made by the author.
The article is a detailed comparison between the male and female tendencies in stalking where the focus has been shed on the female stalking, which is often less publicised but is equally rampant. The motivation behind the stalking, however, is different in females than in males. The main motivation in females is basically to establish a personal and intimate relationship with the victim. The females stalk males as well as females. Although the females have less possibility of prior violent records, they are more likely to threaten and blackmail the victims. This article also disproves the existing biased opinion that the females do not stalk.
The work of assessing a research paper must be unbiased and should include a common metric for judging it efficiently. The following criteria may be considered for comparative judging of the research paper. The article is definitely proportionate to the target audience as it intends to create awareness about a lesser talked about yet real topic. There have been several interviews conducted, and the data has been included in the essay. The information provided has also been formatted accordingly. The essay has definitely been useful as it shed light on a comparatively unknown social topic. The intention of the article has been to create awareness. The structure of the essay is comparative as it compares the tendencies of males and females. The logic behind the article is sound, which has also been supported by the required data and statistics. The author has clearly expressed the idea of the article and has delivered the underlying reasons for the topic very vividly. There are no ambiguous statements or claims. The quality of the essay is scholarly, and the objectives have been achieved. The comparison with other research paper has also provided it with credibility.
According to the research conducted by Spitzberg (2002) on 108 people , it had been evident that 22.5% of stalkers are women in comparison to 10.5% men. Spitzberg, Cupach and Ciceraro (2010) are also of the opinion that there are significant risks involved in case of stalking and may involve threats and blackmails. The article, “A study of women who stalk” also reaches a similar conclusion which has been corroborated by these researches. McEwan et al. (2018) stated that the risk profile could be predicted through SRP, which can then be used in clinical utility, and the recommencement of the tendencies can be reduced. The primary idea of the essay that the tendencies of the female are similar to the males but not highlighted is supported by these essays. The reasons of motivations are also different from the males who are supported by the opinion of Katz and Rich (2015) in which the tendencies of the college women in stalking their exes post-breakup has been detailed. The general biased opinion of the society of turning a blind eye to the women stalking has also been presented Kamphuis & Emmelk (2000).The author also pointed out the same point in his essay through his own research. Dardis, Amoroso and Iverson (2017) have also shown that the prior sexual or personal intimacy being the reason for the women stalking their partners in order to attain or re-establish the previous relationship. This idea has also been reiterated by the author while establishing the probable causes for the stalking in women. The analysis results are mostly in accordance with the existing opinion of Peytchev, Baxter and Carley-Baxter (2009) which states that the in spite of highly prevalent stalking occurrences in people, almost nothing is being done for it which makes the identification of a lesser-known dimension of stalking for correct identification of the patterns and behaviours. The myth involving the women being a non-stalker has been busted by the article by Spitzberg, Cupach and Ciceraro (2010). The essay vividly portrays the mock effects of a juror due to gender change in light of the stalking, which establishes the bias existent in the society. Ménard and Cox, (2016) have also given a clear picture of the labelling and victimisation of the female in stalking, and Myers et al.(2016) have taken up the case of university stalking in males and females alike. Senkans, McEwan and Ogloff (2017), presents a gender inclusive study of the stalking behaviours and a systematic relationship between the IPV and PRS in women. Thus, all these researches have provided instances for the claims made by the author in this case. The research findings are also backed by the data and statistics which have been included in the above-mentioned resources. Hellmann and Kleim (2015) have provided some statistics about Germany, which can be a basis for comparative analysis in the current scenario. They have also pointed out how the general people perceive the stalking behaviours depending on gender and attitude. Ngo and Paternoster (2016) stated the impacts of stalking both mental and psychological strains and tried to establish the relationship between the stalking and harassment. The article, “A study of women who stalk” has achieved the intended targets and objectives and also provides sufficient backup from the data derived decisions which are evident and aligned with other essays.
It can be concluded from the above discussion and the various scholar articles that there is stalking tendencies in women too, but it is not highlighted or the notion is socially accepted. The research provides an efficient basis for the conclusions derived which has been done after a detailed analysis of the collected data and also corroborated with other published papers on the topic. The necessity to recognise the recurring and constantly prevalent woman stalking is also called for to improve gender equality and help establish an equitable society. The controlling and mitigating conditions may also be done based on the findings of this paper.