You will demonstrate the knowledge and decisions you applied to plan, prepare, conduct and follow up the meeting you planned and conducted in Assessment Tasks 1 and 2.
This assessment continues from Assessment Tasks 1 and 2.
You are required to write a reflection on the process you went through to plan, prepare, conduct and follow up on your meeting.
You must submit:
Your assessor will be looking for:
Learner’s Outcome 3
In the given meeting, the entire meeting agenda was a complex task, as it included coordination and also to make the other parties understand the need(Hain, 2015). It was more about how to coordinate with the top-level management to the lower level and it was based on the given context of the setting up of the privacy policies and adherence to it.
It was necessary to implement, we need to call upon the senior management such as the Chairperson, Human resource and the other related stakeholders, who would approve the policy. Then it was also important for the lower management staff, to understand the essence of the new policy and the significance of it. It was also how to follow the procedure, adherence to the process and also be able to channelize with the given codes of conduct.
The style of the invitation which was chosen through an email and also attaching the meeting agenda. I was an appropriate setup and it also required a timely intervention, that would be helpful to make the organization follow the formal rules. The budgetary consideration was the set allocated amount of the $ 20,000 and it was an important task to sponsor and be able to divide the funding. The distribution method that was required was through the agenda, distribution of the meetings preparation and the action plans developed. It was important for every participant to prepare and fine-tune themselves with it.
The approach to developing the action plan was based on the given key stakeholders, coordinating with the time, scheduling them and also be able to ensure, they are all be able to attain value-based time and deliverables (Geyer, 2015). Such as if the Human resource is not been able to understand the importance of the privacy piece, how they would be able to aim for the synchronization and would result in the better aimed set up. At the same time, as the individual, what could be the repercussion effects and what would be based on channelizing the income, related inputs and would be centric to the approach of the related parties.
Implementation would be based on the action plan that could be related to the other parties and would aim in terms of the desired protocols. It was seen that some of the lower management people were indifferent as they were supposed to implement the plans, we're unable to absorb it, while the others were unable to relate to the desired framework of the protocols. At first, it would be created with the given framework that was unable to absorb and was unable to relate with the given plans. It was also an issue, as it was unable to adhere to the code of conduct and would be aimed at the given protocols that were difficult to manage.