HI6028 Case Studies Of Specific Deductions And Tax Liability Assessment Answer

Question :

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester	T1 2021
Unit Code	HI6028
Unit Title	Taxation Theory, Practice & Law
Assessment Type	Individual Assignment
Assessment Title	Case Studies of Specific Deductions and Tax Liability
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)	Students are required to follow the instructions by your lecturer to confirm any relevant information. You also need to follow any relevant announcement on Blackboard to confirm the due date and time of the assignment. The individual assignment will assess students on the following learning outcomes: Demonstrate an understanding of the Australian income tax system, the concept of FBT, Ordinary Income, deductions, general anti-avoidance provisions and income tax administration. (ULO 1). Identify and critically analyse taxation issues. (ULO 2). Interpret the relevant taxation legislations and case law. (ULO 3). Apply taxation principles to real life problems. (ULO 4).
Weight	This assignment task accounts for 25 % of total marks in this unit.
Total Marks	This assignment task accounts for 25 marks of total marks in this unit.
Word limit	Max 2000 words (acceptable to be 10% above or below this word limit).

Submission Guidelines

Instructions: Please read carefully to avoid mistakes.

Answer all questions.
This assignment along with a completed Assignment Cover Page is to be submitted on Blackboard by the due date in soft copy only.
The self-check links are no longer available as a separate link in each unit’s assessment. Students are now limited to attempt any given assignment submission a maximum of once. After this attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report with Blackboard Learning Management System. This will provide detailed information about the matches found between your submitted works and existing sources.
The assignment is to be submitted in accordance with assessment policy stated in the Unit Outline and Student Handbook.
It is the responsibility of the student submitting the work to ensure that the work is in fact his/her own work. Incorporating another’s work or ideas into one’s own work without appropriate acknowledgement is an

academic offence.

•	Harvard Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style. You also must refer to relevant legislation and/or case law in your answer. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.
•	Note: Assessment task is set around the work that you have done in class. You are not expected to go outside the content of the unit, but you are expected to explore it.

Assignments’ Instructions and RequirementsQuestion 1

(Marks - 10)

Calculate Total Assessable Income, Taxable Income, Tax Liability, Student loan (HECS), Medicare Levy, and Medicare Levy Surcharge if applicable, for the taxpayer (Susanne) with the information below:

Susanne is a single and an Australian resident plans to lodge a tax return for the tax year 2020 - 2021.
Her total taxable income is $90,000 (Including tax withheld).
She does not have private health insurance.
Susanne has a student loan HECS outstanding for her previous study at Sydney University of $53,000.
Her employer pays superannuation guarantee charge of 9.5% on top of her salary to her nominated fund.
Susanne earned a passive income of $10,000 from the investments in shares in the same tax year.

Question – 2

Marks (7.5 +7.5 =15)

Part-A

What is ‘fringe benefit tax’ (FBT)? Explain at least five main salient features of the FBT?

Part -B

Calculate the taxable value of the fringe benefit using the statutory formula in the following case context:

Carron provides his employee (Rabbie) with the use of a Nissan Xtrail car 196 days during the FBT year. During the period, the car travelled 15,000 km. Carron purchased the car last year for $45,000. Rabbie contributed $1,500 towards the cost of running the car and has provided Carron with relevant documentation.

Academic Integrity

Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on Blackboard.

Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.

Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breaches

Plagiarism		Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self-plagiarism.
Collusion		Working with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, in a way that is not authorised.
Copying		Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied, this may also be considered an offence.
Impersonation		Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself, in an in-person examination.
Contract cheating		Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment.
Datafabrication falsification		Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false conclusions, including manipulating images.

If any words or ideas used the assignment submission do not represent your original words or ideas, you must cite all relevant sources and make clear the extent to which such sources were used.

In addition, written assignments that are similar or identical to those of another student is also a

violation of the Holmes Institute’s Academic Conduct and Integrity policy.

The consequences for a violation of this policy include a range of penalties varying from a 50% penalty through suspension of enrolment. The penalty would be dependent on the extent of academic misconduct and your history of academic misconduct issues.

All assessments will be automatically submitted to SafeAssign to assess their originality.

For further information and additional learning resources please refer to your Discussion Board for the unit.

Answer :

For solution, connect with our online professionals.

Tags:hi6028 deductions and tax liability

HI6028 Case Studies Of Specific Deductions And Tax Liability Assessment Answer

Question :

Answer :

Save Time & Improve Grades