Matter of Illegal Drug Usage in Musical Concerts: Critical appraisal of Evidence Assessment 3 Answer
ASSESSMENT 3 OVERVIEW – Critical appraisal of evidence
The research topic that was chosen for the research work was presented by Day et al. (2018) and demanded the expert mindset and hands to complete the project work successfully. However, to support the views of the author, he used some abbreviations to justify his statements. These are, Drug Information and Monitoring System, Trans European Drug Information, Paramethoxyamphetamine etc. All of these used abbreviations are highly appropriate for this kind of research work and justifies the views and reviews of the author. Therefore, it is essential to use relative abbreviations that support the views of the author, and in this case, the abbreviations do precisely so.
In this paper, a type of biases can be seen, as this paper is dedicated to the matter of illegal drug usage in the musical concerts. However, as the primary and centre topic is that so the abbreviations, analytical data and other information to justify that. The presence of conflict related to the topic biases is low, as this report is highly topic-centric.
2. Research questions, aims or hypothesis:
Every research work demands the aim or objective to complete the work, and at the end of the project, the questions have to be justified fully. In this case, these are:
- To determine the proportion and patterns of illicit drug use among young people
- To know about their attitudes towards the drug checking event at the festivals
- To determine the potential impact of the event of drug checking upon the intended drug use behaviour.
The above-mentioned objectives were taken by the author, and the objectives justified the research work, as all of the objective's dedicated aim is to gather knowledge about the illegal drug usage in the music festival. The research questions or objectives also provide some essential relative information too like the behaviour of the drug users etc., which can act as a crucial part also for the welfare of this report.
3. Research design:
In this research paper, the author mainly used descriptive analytical method to get the answer to the questions. However, for the welfare of this project, a survey was done in association with the author and his set of questions. For this specific act, the research work mainly followed the primary data collection method for the collection of the specific data from a group of 10-12 youths (Pearson et al., 2018), who are the chief representative of the total youth in that festival. So as not much brief answers were available so that the analytical method followed the quantitative approach. It is justified that this kind of research work which is mainly and only can take place inside a festival, so these kind processes are needed as much more time is not available in the hand of the respondents.
4. Research Methods:
The research work mainly followed the primary type of data collection method in which the research work mainly took place by a survey, which was held in a music festival and the cooperation with the youths. This kind of data collection method is also justified as this research work demanded the face-to-face interaction to get the acute face expression too along with the answers. As many brief answers were not available regarding the questions so that the quantitative analysis took place (Asmus et al., 2017). This is also justified that in the case of illegal drug usage in a festival or any kind of concert, the answers of the selected question had no option to be briefly answered except some questions. So that the research work followed the quantitative type of data analysis, from which the researchers got the result upon which they drew the conclusion and the result part. For this reason, the use of these two methods in this kind of research work is justified enough.
5. Results and limitation of the study:
73.4% of respondents answered that they were in the affection of illicit drugs in the past 12 months and stated that used mostly cannabis and ecstasy. While 86.5% responded that the drug checking could reduce the harms of illicit drugs, but 84.9% also stated that it would be more effective if the checking service is accompanied by harm reduction advice too. However, 68.6% of respondents agreed on the matter that quality control measurements also have the capability to stop this practice or to reduce it. Whereas 54.6% were in the full support to the drug checking activity, however, 32.7% of respondents agreed to support that movement. These results support the objectives of the research work as these determined the proportion and patterns of illicit drug use among young people revealed people’s attitudes towards the drug checking event at the festivals and determined the potential impact of the event of drug checking upon the intended drug use behaviour.
However, these results were not a result without limitations or limiting factor. Many limitations were present, as some groups of the 10-12 youths were participated in the research survey, among the participants of the music festivals. However, this is not possible practically that these some groups of youth can represent the whole youths of the society or the views of whole youths of society. The survey took place in the daylights, and upon the face reading method, many participants were removed from the survey as their face did not look like a drug user, among the respondents, the number of the female respondents were high than the male number, so the result also had a biased. This depicts that the male category is mainly the users of these drugs, and so that biases arrived. These are the main limitations of the research work; if the limitations are solved in the future, then the better result can be obtained.
This kind of results and the analysis of results has a profound impact on the drug users and upon the company too. However, the research approach and the objectives were dedicated to the youths of the society, and this kind of research work depicts that the real and loyal initiatives if taken by an individual along with the government then this kind of practices can be kept under control (Fox et al., 2018). However, from this result, one more thing noticed that in the festivals just like music festivals or any other, the incident of the illicit drug became high in rate and this kind of activity mostly done by the male category.
In this research work, the limitations were mainly acted as a barrier, as the female participants were high in number so that the result becomes biased, less number of the male participant also acted as a barrier as this influence the result a lot. Similarly, the restriction to organise the event in the night also worked as a barrier as the drug users mainly use illicit drugs at night, so this kind of activity also influenced the result a lot. However, self-research work also can be regarded as a barrier. However, along with all these barriers, the result of research work is still valuable and along with some changes in the research procedure if the research will be reorganised in future, then it will be more effective. However, the measurements of the research findings still help a lot.