Assessment for New Year 1 Module –
Introduction to Management
Assessment Template for Students
|Academic year and term:||Year 1, Term 2|
|Module title:||Introduction to Management (Level 4)|
Dr Guy Bohane
|Learning outcomes assessed within this piece of work as agreed at the programme level meeting||Knowledge outcome – On completion of this module you will be able to demonstrate an understanding of the processes, procedures and practices for effective management in organisations.|
Intellectual /transferrable skill outcome – Students who successfully complete this module will be developing your competence in using a range of basic analytical and managerial techniques and processes including objective setting, monitoring and evaluation as well as interpersonal skills of successful managers.
|Business Readiness outcomes assessed within this piece of work as agreed at the programme level meeting||Students will be developing an understanding of and using techniques to solve business problems with awareness of commercial acumen as well as developing your ability to write reports and have confidence in team working.|
|1)Type of assessment:|
(one summative assessment per module)
|One summative assessment which is an individual report on a case study investigated collaboratively within a team of 4 to 6 students. The report will be 2,000 words in total. |
|Submission date and time||Students submit reports through Turnitin by Friday 31st March 2017, 2pm|
|Marks and feedback date:||Within 20 working days of submission of the report – Tuesday 2nd May 2017.|
|9) Formative Assessment|
Dates as agreed at programme level meeting
How formative contributes to summative assessment
|As part of the analysis for the report there will be a team exercise in week 4 to plan and design sets of questions around the case study with each individual team members (maximum of 6 team member) to plan and devise questions (10 questions each) relating to one specific topic within the case. The questions, both qualitative and quantitative will be addressed to a practicing manager who will facilitate further understanding of problems and challenges within the case. Students will be provided feedback on the quality and coherence of the questions being asked in the context of applying management theory to practice in the case study. Further formative feedback will be provided in class on the team exercise.|
Summative Assessment: Instructions to students
Assessment Case Study – The Imperial Hotel, London
The assessment is based on a business and management case study which requires a team-based approach to identifying and problem-solving a range of business and management challenges within the case. You will work within a team of 4 to 6 people throughout the term to undertake research and analysis with the aim of undertaking research in collaboration with a practising manager to produce a report which includes a summary and key justifications for the resolution of one of the problems in the case.
The report will be an individual 2,000 words report which will address one of the specific problems identified in the case (e.g. a human resource management challenge, an ethical problem, a performance and productivity issue, etc). You will receive a full briefing including the case study in week 1 seminar.
Students will be expected to apply management theory to practice throughout the report.
Case Study – The Imperial Hotel, London
The Imperial Hotel is a London 500 bedroom hotel, which is owned and managed part of a well-known international branded chain of hotels in the 4 star market – Star Hotels which operates 25 hotels in the UK. The Imperial Hotel, located in the heart of London’s West End, caters for mainly international business and tourists guests who have high expectation in terms of service standards.
The facilities at the hotel include the following:
A new General Manager, Peter Farnsworth, has recently taken over the management of the whole hotel. He is an experienced manager having worked in several of the other Star city centre hotels outside London. The previous General Manager, who had just retired, had been experiencing a range of problems in managing the hotel, namely that: there was a very high turnover of staff in all the departments running around 80% a year mainly due to poor staff morale; the hotel was graded the lowest in the whole Star chain in terms of overall guest satisfaction running at a rate of 65% in the company’s benchmark grading system; the overall sales in the hotel are improving, and although the hotel occupancy (the ratio of rooms sold against the total number of rooms available) was running at 90% for the year, the actual average room rate (ARR) achieved, currently running at £95 per room per night was relatively low compared to the local competition. This poor performance is having a direct negative effect on the costs of the hotel and the hotel’s overall profitability.
The Imperial is an old hotel having been in operation for nearly 100 years. The hotel was last fully refurbished some 8 years ago but is now in need of some restoration and redecoration. There is a programme of staged refurbishment in place which means each floor of the hotel is being closed for building work to be undertaken. The consequence of this is that, at any one time for the next two years, 60 rooms will be out of action. This is putting the hotel under budgetary pressure due to the ongoing building costs as well as the loss of income from the 60 rooms out of action at any one time.
Planned Strategy for Resolving the Problems in the Hotel
Peter Farnsworth is under no illusion as to the challenges ahead and has decided to plan a strategy for resolving the operational, management and business-related problems in the hotel. The first part of the plan is to identify the top six problems for the hotel for the coming year. He identifies the problems as follows and Peter has put forward some initial suggestions for resolving each of the problems:
The Problems in Detail
Problem 1: Poor guest satisfaction
The hotel was graded the lowest in the whole Star chain in terms of overall customer satisfaction running at a rate of 65% in the company’s benchmark grading system. The company average is 74%. In every hotel in the chain the company undertakes a monthly Guest Satisfaction Survey (GSS) with regular guests and this includes a summary of guest cards completed by guests in their hotel rooms, as well as more formal online monthly survey with major business clients. The survey asks clients to grade all the facilities in the hotel (see Appendix 1 for the most recent monthly survey results for the Imperial Hotel).
The most regular complaints received are in relation to issues about checking in and checking out of the hotel, the quality of the rooms themselves and the poor quality of staff. There have been a number of complaints about the reception staff being indifferent and sometimes rude to guests. Other guests have been critical of having to wait in queues at reception both for checking into the hotel as well as checking out. A considerable number of guests have complained of repeatedly being charged incorrectly in their final bill. Most worrying is the fact that some guests are also complaining that there has been little or no timely response to their complaints.
In terms of the accommodation in the hotel a growing number of guest are being critical of the quality of the hotel rooms and in particular the cleanliness of the bathrooms, with numerous requests for room changes due to showers not working properly, noisy air conditioning, and technology not working in the rooms.
Initial suggestions by Peter Farnsworth to manage the problem:
Problem 2: High staff turnover with 80% of the staff leaving within the year
Staff turnover in the hotel sector is generally high due to the temporary nature of employment of, for example: students; foreign nationals from the European Union wanting to work for short periods in London; and generally low pay (on average just at the living wage rate). The turnover of staff is particularly high in the Imperial hotel for front-line staff.
The exit interviews with leaving staff have identified a number of issues around: poor perception of the work culture within the hotel with sometimes aggressive supervisory and management styles in evidence: the unsociable working hours; a lack of proper and regular training; poor pay levels compared to working for example food retailing; little opportunity for promotion or bonuses; the high cost of travelling to work in central London and difficulties in getting transport home at night; A number of young and talented supervisory staff have also left the hotel to work at competitor hotel companies who offer better pay, working conditions and benefits.
The high level of staff turnover puts direct pressure on the staffing budget with staff costs currently running at around 35% of sales for the hotel which is a particularly high for this type of hotel. The need to continuously employ new staff has considerably increased induction training costs as well as had a negative impact of the overall quality of the service to guests, particularly the regular guests who are now reducing in number and appear to be using other hotels.
There appears to be an cycle emerging which may be linked to the high level of staff turnover which subsequently affecting the whole organisation. In terms of individual members of staff there appears to be decreased job satisfaction and a lack of commitment to the hotel with an intent to leave. This shows itself in attendance problems, decreased work performance, and sometimes stress. As a consequence there is an increased pressure on colleagues to pick up the slack which contributes to routine system problems and a ‘culture of turnover’. This operational staff as well as management as well as this often results in a decreased pool of promotable staff and managers. The result of this for the hotel is that there are managerial succession problems. Other consequences include operational bureaucracy.
Initial suggestions by Peter Farnsworth to manage the problem:
Problem 3: A negative work culture amongst the staff with high levels of sick leave and poor attendance
The organisational culture of working within Star Hotels is performance driven. The General Manager, and the Heads of Departments are under continuous pressure to increase sales month-by-month by increasing the occupancy of the hotel as well as pushing up the average room rate. The hotel is assessed on a monthly basis and managers’ bonus schemes are directly linked to the financial performance of increasing sales and reducing and controlling costs. The espoused values of Star Hotels is about excellence in customer service and hence performance is also linked to the results of the Guest Satisfaction Surveys (GSS). The London hotels consistently perform worse than the other hotels in the Star Group and this is linked to guests’ perceptions that London hotels are overly expensive and offer poor value for money. The managers and Heads of Department often complain that that the guest surveys put them at a disadvantage because comparing experiences and views of guests staying in a London hotel is completely different to say a leisure-based hotel in Scotland whereby guests are more relaxed.
The work culture in the hotel under the previous General Manager was somewhat toxic. The hotel, being a busy London 24 hour and 365 day a year operation, means that there are often long working hours, particularly for those staff covering for staff who may have gone off sick at short notice. Many of the part-time staff are female and have family commitments, and in many cases have other part-time jobs to fit round those family commitments. This has often resulted in these staff turning up late for their work shifts, and there have been many occasions whereby staff ask their colleagues to cover for them for short periods without informing their supervisors. The levels of supervision of staff has been minimal because of the high turnover of supervisory staff.
In the recent past the style of management could be described as authoritarian and often dictatorial with very little consultation with lower levels of staff in terms of ways of improving performance and minimal feedback in terms of how to improve on working practices or meet the guests’ needs.
Initial suggestions by Peter Farnsworth to manage the problem:
Problem 4: Ineffective leadership and management by previous Heads of Department and supervisory staff including poor monitoring and control procedures
The poor leadership and management by the previous General Manager has left the hotel in a precarious position. The high levels of staff turnover, the disappointing sales performance and the poor results on the Guest Satisfaction Surveys has identified a number of issues about the quality of leadership and management within the hotel in all departments.
The Heads of Departments (HODs), whose bonuses are linked to their own department’s performance are often hostile in in terms of defending their own department’s position in HOD meetings. Several of the HODs have been in their post at the hotel for over 10 years and many have left the hotel as a result of the previous General Manager retiring. In reviewing the monitoring and control procedures through the hotel, Pater Farnsworth has identified many instances of supervisors and managers failing to monitor the standard of work undertaken daily in housekeeping, in the kitchens and the hotel’s reception. There are weak reporting practices and when considering the specific complaints by guests there seems to be a disconnect between what is reported and what happens in reality.
Peter Farnsworth now sees the gap in good management as an opportunity to attract talented managers and leaders to help turn round the performance of the hotel. He sees that the past management is somewhat impoverished and tended to be purely task oriented. He sees the importance of departments working as teams but also there is a need for strong leadership and collaboration between departments. Many of the complaints from guests are as a result of poor communication between key functions and there has been a distinct lack of leadership and supportive management.
Initial suggestion by Peter Farnsworth to manage the problem:
Problem 5: Front of house staff (Reception, Conference & Banqueting, and Restaurant & Bars) – poor team working and inefficient use of IT systems including the reservation and property management systems
The front of house staff, particularly in the Reception have a pivotal customer-facing role in offering service and support to guests. The Reception needs to be open 24 hours a day and is the first point-of-call for guests as well key staff in all Departments to have up-to-date information and data on guest arrivals and departures, specific guest needs and guest billing data. The Reception staff at the Imperial Hotel work three, 8 hour shifts working in teams. Each team has a supervisor and they have a particularly challenging function of managing Reception teams as well as in passing on important guest information and data on to the next shift. The hotel uses a Micros Fidelio reservation and Property Management System (PMS) which provides up-to-date information on real-time and prospective guests and their reservations. The other departments including the kitchen, restaurants and conferencing are dependent on Reception for guest numbers and data.
Some of the key Reception staff have been in conflict with the other Departments after numerous complaints about wrong and inaccurate information being provided. Housekeeping have been given wrong or out-of-date data on room availability, and whether a guest is staying on in the hotel. Reception have also failed to inform Housekeeping about early and late arrivals and subsequently rooms have not been cleaned in time with guests having to wait for long periods to get their room keys. The conference and banqueting staff have complained that they have not been provided with proper data on numbers of guests coming in for meetings and conferences. This, combined with complaints from guests that Reception staff are often abrupt or even rude in dealing with even the most basic request has caused a lot of animosity within the Reception staff and other staff throughout the hotel. The Reception Department has become somewhat dysfunctional and there are examples of Reception shift teams arguing with in the incoming teams about not providing proper handover information.
A new Head of Department of Front Office and Reception, working closing with the General Manager, is aware of the conflict issues within the department as well as with the other departments within the hotel and intends to undertake a stand to manage the conflict quickly and efficiently. The Reception teams’ dynamics are not good, and there is a blame culture with staff not working constructively and there is a clash of some strong personalities within the Department. He is going to review: the way the teams are structured; the individual performance of staff in terms of performance and productivity; the rewards and benefit being offered for good performance; and training and development needs. He also intends to develop and co-ordinate a team-based approach to managing the staff. The poor data issues can be dealt with through improved use of the IT systems (PMS) although the animosity within and between working teams will be more difficult to resolve
Initial suggestions by Peter Farnsworth to resolve the problem:
Problem 6: Back of house staff (Housekeeping, Kitchen, Maintenance) – poor operating and control procedures in place with stock being regularly pilfered and evidence of staff not meeting basic Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) resulting in unusually high operating costs
Staffing the Housekeeping Department at the Grand hotel is always a challenge. There are up to 400-500 rooms to service a day, and this overseen by the Executive Housekeeper and 12 supervisory and administration staff. In the past year, it has proved very difficult to recruit room attendants, and those who are employed only tend to stay for no longer than 6 months. The staff turnover in the department is currently 60% a year. The hotel therefore resorted, two years ago to using a recruitment agency, ABC (International) to fill 30 of the 50 room attendants jobs in the departments. The 20 in-house staff are a hardcore of long-term employees who have worked for the company for many years.
ABC (International) is a recruitment company run by Charles Santos who has considerable experience in the hotel industry in England and Spain. Each candidate is interviewed and assessed on their English before they are included on the database. All candidates produce three references which are checked by ABC prior to their departure from Spain. They must have considerable practical experience of working in a hotel housekeeping department before taking up a post. If the hotel cannot provide staff accommodation then ABC will organise it for them.
The quality of the Spanish staffs’ work is good overall, and the cost of employing the staff through the agency is only marginally more expensive that employing home staff. The Spanish staff tend to stay with the hotel for up to a year. The Spanish staff prefer to work together in their shifts with other Spanish staff, and are supervised and provided on-the-job training as to the brand standards for the hotel by the in-house Assistant Head Housekeeper, herself a fluent Spanish speaker.
There has been considerable discontent from the in-house room attendant claiming that the Spanish staff are un-cooperative when asked to work with non-Spanish staff. The Spanish staff are used to working in teams in their shifts, working together in pairs who are allocated 20 room a day to service. The standard of the in-house staffs’ working has been dropping. The hotel uses the Texlon system, which is a hand-held tracker system whereby a supervisor will undertake a sample check of the room standards and rank and score the standards of a serviced room. The results are subsequently plugged into the hotel computer and each member of staff is given a ranking out of 100. The Spanish staff (75%+ scores) consistently score higher than the in-house staff (60%-65%), which again has caused considerable resentment. The attendance of the in-house staff, all employed on full-time contracts, is getting progressively worse which has put pressure on the housekeeping budget.
There have recently been a number of complaints from hotel guests, who have not been happy with the general level of cleanliness in the hotel bedroom and in particular the bathroom. There have also been a number of complaints about housekeeping room attendants being abrupt and sometimes rude. When these cases have been investigated, it is becoming clear that full-time staff have poor motivation levels.
Initial suggestion by Peter Farnsworth to manage the problem:
As one the six Heads of Departments, you have been asked by Peter Farnsworth to take responsibility for analysing the problem, commenting on Peter Farnsworth’s initial suggestions and putting forward a joint set of resolutions for the listed problems. You are therefore to work collaboratively with the other Heads of Departments to put forward and prioritise proposals for the resolution of the overall problems. The expectation is that within 12 months there should be dramatic improvement and change in performance in all six areas. You have asked to write a 2,500 word report addressing your single problem topic to attempt to resolve that problem in the hotel.
Staff Incentive Schemes
There are currently a number of incentive schemes to encourage staff to meet excellent standards of work, and to improve productivity. These include: Employee of the Month (for the whole hotel - £200) and employee of the month for each department (£50); staff (including agency staff) consistently meeting individual and performance targets in three consecutive months within the department (£200 vouchers towards staying in any one of Star Hotels); department, end-of-year parties (funded by the hotel); college fees being paid (NVQ levels 2-4).
INTRODUCTION TO MANAGEMENT
With rapid growing of hospitality industry, roles and responsibilities of managers have also increased to a high extent. Failing to do so, can lead to creating various problems for the organization. Hence, the study involves identifying and analyzing the key reasons of the issues faced by Imperial Hotel, London. Beside different other problem, the organization is facing the high staff turnover rate due to inappropriate management of staffs. Therefore, the organization has hired a new general manager for finding effective solutions to the problem. The manager has suggested some solution to cope with the problems, based on which useful recommendations are made for Imperial hotel. The study analyses all the issues and suggestions with the help of different academic and hospitality theories, which helped to develop suitable recommendations for further improvement.
Teams need persistence, time and leadership. It is the most crucial job role performed by managers. Manager is accountable for identifying and fulfilling the needs of the employees in order to increase their morale and dedication toward the organization. Organizations must know that staffs are the most valuable asset of the firm, as without them it would not be possible to conduct the business activities efficiently (Blomme et al. 2010). Therefore, the study aims at discussing the staff-management related issues faced by The Imperial Hotel, London to identify the underlying reasons. Wang et al. (2014) stated that, one must know that hotel industry is highly dependent on their employees as this is a hospitality sector, which is based on providing good quality of services to the guests and tourists. However, at present time the organization is facing a number of issues including the high rate of staff turnover. Therefore, a new experienced general manager has been appointed for finding out the key reasons of the high employee-turnover rate.
In order to solve the issue, the general manger has provided some suggestions, which would be discussed using different theories for understating their effectiveness to staff management. Further, few significant recommendations would be provided along with justification those would be helpful for the firm to retain their staffs for life and decrease the turnover rate.
Introduction and discussion of the problem- The Imperial hotel in London is a part of the international brand name Star Hotels, which has total 450 employees in 6 different departments among whom, 300 staffs are employed for full-time and rest are part-time. Since the year 1837, the organization is focused at offering an utmost quality of services, accommodation and value for money (imperialhotels.co.uk, 2017). However, at present time, due to lack of efficiency of the previous manager, the firm is facing a wide number of issues and high rate of employee turnover has become one of the most significant issues. The staff turnover rate has reached to 80% from different departments especially in front-line-employees, which possess a vital threat to operation management of the organization (imperialhotels.co.uk., 2017).
The first and most important reason that led to increased rate of employee turnover include the aggressive nature of the management. Apart from that, the employees are not satisfied with the work culture, wage and working hours. A survey with the leaving staffs revealed that the wage is very low comparing with though working hours. Hence, they prefer to join in other hotels, which provide better salary and working environment. Moreover, staffs complaint that there is no opportunity for career development within the hotel and they are not provided with required training. Some of the staffs faced difficulties in going back home from the hotel, as it becomes hard to get transport at night from the central part of London ad they have to bear high travelling cost. It can be seen that one issue creates another issue. For instance due to low staff morale and high turnover rate, the organization fails to provide high quality of services to the guests, which leads to customer dissatisfaction and low profit rate. Further, it increases the cost of the company of hiring new staffs and providing them training, which has a negative impact on the profit margin of the company.
Academic theories like McGregor’s theory X and theory Y may helps in understanding the employee behavior and motivational factors at work. The theory X assumed individuals as lazy, who hate to take responsibilities and work and they love to have only security and reward. It can be seen in the context of the Imperial hotel that the staffs are not rewarded and there is either a very low or no chance of being promoted. Therefore, the employees fail to survive in the company (Kusluvan et al. 2010).
On the other hand, theory Y advocates that staffs want to be trained and work in their usual activity to the point they foster self-development and discipline. They love to attempt challenging tasks and being appreciated for doing so. Here, the role of the manger is to connect them with their desired activities that subsequently increase the overall organizational productivity. In Imperial Hotel, the previous manager fail to maintain an effective relationship with the staffs that made them feel demotivated (Markovic and Raspor, 2010).
Myung et al. (2012) stated that, Total quilt management is an important hospitality theory that is highly useful for the hospitality industry. Total quality management can only be achieved by cohesive working of all the departments of an organization. However, in Imperial hotel, it is identified that the management failed to motivate the employees to encourage in organizational decision-making and perform as an important part of the company. Due to which, the company had to face various issues related to quality management.
As compared to other hospitality sectors, staff turnover rate at Imperial hotel is the highest. Staff turnover rate in the hospitality sector increased to 72.1% in 2015 that was 66.7% in 2014. However, in 2007 the rate was very high 80.7%. As compared to present turnover rate, the turnover rate in Imperial hotel is much higher (thecaterer-magazine.co.uk, 2017).
Image 1: Employee turnover rate in hospitality industry
(Source: Thecaterer-magazine.co.uk, 2017)
In order to cope with the issues related to staff management, the new manager of Imperial hotel has put forward some suggestions those need to be analyzed before final implementation. Peter Farnsworth suggested attracting and retaining employees to the main managerial positions, which can be an effective step. However, for attracting employees, the organization needs to modify its work culture, redesign the payment structure, flexible working hours, and provide opportunities for promotion and career development. According to Niu (2010), employees should be treated as an important part of the business and the management should behave with them in a friendly manner so that they can easily discuss their issue with the management. This enhances employee morale and loyalty, which is mentioned in the theory Y. However, Tang (2014.) argued that besides reward, employees should get punishment for their poor quality of work, which is termed as ‘stick and carrot’ attitude supported by theory X. As per Herzberg’s two factor theory there are two important factors need to be considered for increasing employee motivation and commitment including motivators and hygiene factors. This theory supports that employee can be motivated and retained thorough providing them with safe working environment and reasonable pay.
Another suggestion made by the new manager is to offer bonuses and packages that encourage staffs to stay with the company. This suggestion can also be effective in reducing the staff turnover rate. As per Maslow, employees have four basic needs that must be considered and fulfilled by the employers including physiological, security, belongingness, esteem and self-actualization. Self-actualization is the upper most part of Maslow’s pyramid, where an employee can reach after having fulfilled all the needs of the other four sections (Trkman, 2010). Hence, providing fair and secure working environment, salary packages would be helpful for the Imperial hotel in retaining employees.
Benchmark pay scales can be highly effective for Imperial in staff retaining. In order to do so, the organization must identify the pay scale of its key competitors such as Emerald, Millennium Gloucestar, St James’ Court A Taj hotel and so on. Further, based on the fresh data, the HR manager must develop a sound pay scale for the employees.
Providing training and conducting performance appraisal for the staffs would also be helpful, as, it would enhance confidence of the staffs in providing effective services to the tourists that would increases customer satisfaction. Further, Yang (2010) commented that, the regular performance appraisal would be helpful in identifying the performance quality of the tasks based on which, appropriate reward should be offered to them. This suggestion can also be supported by the theory of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, where employees reach the level of self-actualization when employees feel esteemed by their superior due to accomplishing a challenging task or the responsibility assigned to them (Nadiri and Tanova, 2010).
Peter Farnsworth has suggested managing the staffs through applying hard and soft HR practices. However, as the company is facing the issue of a very high level of staff turnover rate, hence, the soft HRM would be more preferable as compared to hard HRM. As per the soft HRM, Imperial must treat the employees as the most significant asset and a basis of competitive advantage. Hence, all the staffs need to be communicated regularly for identifying and fulfilling their needs effectively. This can be supported by the notion of Behavioral management theory that includes the human aspect of work. The theory supports understanding employee behavior at work including conflict, motivation, expectations, improved productivity and team dynamics (Heizer and Render, 2014). In the word of Guchait and Cho (2010), this theory considers staffs as important resources than machines. Resolving the issues of staff turnover would contribute to solve other related issues like customer satisfaction, poor staff attendance, poor team working, and inefficiency of management. All these issues together led to the increased staff turnover rate in Imperial hotel. Therefore, taking initiatives to cope with staff retention would solve the managerial issues the organization is facing currently.
In order to reduce staff turnover rate and increase staff retention, Imperial hotel must focus on increasing staff engagement, which notion can be supported by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. As stated by Chand (2010), for many individuals, the fundamental need of a job is the salary that allows them to continue a lifestyle they are used to. Having a sense of economic independence is natural in almost all people.
Image 2: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs applied to staff engagement
(Source: Chaffey and White, 2010m p.69)
Next employees need a job security so that they do not have any fear of losing their jobs. Further, they need, belongingness and esteem from their workplace, which can be done by engaging employees in organizational decision-making process. Therefore, it is critical to understand for the managers of Imperial hotel that employees should feel like they are part of something greater and their contribution toward the organization is valued. Each employee possesses some ambition and hence, it is the responsibility of the organization is to connect that aspiration and facilitate growth of employees.
Another recommendation for Imperial hotel is to provide staff development training in order to increase their efficiency in terms of providing good quality of services. With changing business system and growing business, it becomes essential to provide training to the staffs after indentifying their specific needs. This not only enhances employee skill and capability but also increases customer satisfaction, as improves staff performance leads to better quality of services.
A regular performance appraisal system along with a reward system must be there within the Imperial hotel. Performance appraisal would help the firm to identify the individual contribution of each staff along with their achievements according to which, the firm needs to offer rewards. The manger of Imperial hotel should play the role of theory Y manager of McGregor, who assumes workers as trustworthy and capable of fulfilling responsibilities and have greater motivation level. On fulfilling the responsibilities and doing something beyond, the employees must be appraised and rewarded (Barrows et al. 2012).
Due to lack of managerial efficiency, Imperial hotel in London is facing some significant issues that have created significant threats for its competitiveness and profit margin. Turnover rate of employees in the hotel increased to 80 within just one year. The key reason behind this high rate if turnover is inappropriate behavior of the manager toward the employees, low payment scale as compared to other companies, no reward and career development opportunities and high travelling cost. Therefore, the newly appointed manager Peter Farnsworth provided some suggestions those are discussed through different theories related hospitality and staff management. After carrying out wide discussion and comparison, it is recommended to Imperial hotel to focus on increasing employee engagement, carrying out training and development programs, regular performance appraisal and reward system for increasing staff morale decreasing turnover rate. The recommendations fulfilled the aim of the study aptly. This would be helpful for the Imperial hotel in managing their issues by increasing employee retention and thus to solve other related issues.