Abc Assignment Help

SYAD 310 Systems Analysis and Design: Content Analysis Assessment 3 Answer


COURSE: Bachelor of Business (Information Systems Specialisation)
Unit Code:
SYAD 310
Unit Title:
Systems Analysis and Design
Type of Assessment:
Assessment 3 - Content Analysis (Reflective Journal)
3,000 words

Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:
  1. Able to apply iterative incremental systems software development processes
  2. Describe and apply iterative incremental systems software development processes, such as structured, object-oriented and agile approaches
  3. Evaluate and choose appropriate software designs to compose the design of an information system7. Understand and communicate business requirements and information system designs effectively

Assessment Task:
Students are required to analyse the weekly lecture material of weeks 1 to 11 and create concise content analysis summaries of the theoretical concepts
contained in the course lecture slides.
Total Mark:
50 Marks
50% of total unit marks


Details will be provided by end of week 9


The assignment must be submitted online in Moodle. Where additional documents need to be attached, all materials MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats (e.g., pdf or MAC file) may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in MS Word. No paper based or hardcopy submission will be accepted.


Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.

Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System (Moodle).

Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.

Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.

Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length. 


For solution, connect with our online professionals. 

Customer Testimonials